You are reading

Van Bramer Disappointed: Many Queens Senators Voted Against Gay Marriage

The New York State Senate rejected a bill Wednesday that would have made New York the sixth state to allow gay marriage, stunning advocates such as Jimmy Van Bramer, the NYC councilman-elect who represents Sunnyside, Woodside and Long Island City.

The New York measure needed 32 votes to pass and failed by a wider-than-expected margin, falling eight votes short in a 24-38 decision by the state Senate. The Assembly had earlier approved the bill, and Gov. David Paterson had pledged to sign it.

Council Members-elect Jimmy Van Bramer (26th District) and Danny Dromm (25th District), who made history last month by becoming the first openly gay elected officials in the borough of Queens, voiced deep disappointment with the five Queens State Senators who voted against the bill.

Van Bramer and Dromm also applauded the two Queens Senators who voted for the bill – Senate President Malcolm Smith and Senator Toby Stavisky – for their courage and leadership.

Van Bramer and Dromm expressed particular disappointment with the two Senators who represent them, George Onorato (Van Bramer) and Hiram Monserrate (Dromm), who voted no.

Onorato has been targeted by advocates over his stance throughout the year. Same-sex marriage advocates have held a number of rallies in Astoria. However, Onorato has been clear for some time that he opposes gay marriage, but had promised not to block it from getting to the senate floor for a vote.

District 26 Council Member-elect Van Bramer said: “Today was an opportunity to celebrate and honor our diversity, to take a stand for human rights and human dignity,” adding that “Two members of the Queens delegation – Senators Smith and Stavisky – embraced this vision. But sadly, five other Queens Senators voted to deny a basic civil right to their own constituents. Their views are not representative of a diverse, inclusive borough that just elected two openly gay elected officials for the first time.”

New York State also doesn’t allow civil unions, but has several laws, executive orders and court decisions that grant many of the rights to gays long enjoyed by married heterosexual couples.

For a June story, see:

http://yournabe.com/articles/2009/06/05/queens/queens_btuqekt06032009.txt

email the author: news@queenspost.com

4 Comments

Click for Comments 
sunnyside_south

given that we elect these politicans to represent the views of the community, it will be interested to see if the people of astoria return onorato to albany for another term next year.

Reply
frank caropreso

This is a sad day. I can no longer say that I live in an enlightened state or perhaps even city. We must separate church and state to do what is right, This issue is such a no brainer and it shouldn’t even be an issue on the radar when the economy, unemployment, global environmental disasters and 2 wars loom so large. Everyone should have the right to marry whomever they choose regardless of gender. Let’s put this to a vote. End of story.

Reply
Anon

The government has too much control over the people of New York. We’re over-taxed by the City, State and Federal governments whose members seem to think that wage earners have bottomless pockets (and no say in how our money is spent)

Pro or con this isn’t an issue that should be decided by politicians but by the citizens of New York.

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Op-ed: An urgent call for revising NY’s criminal justice reforms to protect public safety

Apr. 11, 2024 By Council Member Robert Holden

In 2019, the State Legislature and Governor Andrew Cuomo embarked on a controversial overhaul of New York’s criminal justice system by enacting several laws, including cashless bail and sweeping changes to discovery laws. Simultaneously, the New York City Council passed laws that compounded these challenges, notably the elimination of punitive segregation in city jails and qualified immunity for police officers. These actions have collectively undermined public safety and constrained law enforcement effectiveness.