You are reading

Sunnyside Yard Steering Committee Holds First Meeting to Discuss Master Plan For Project

via EDC

June 29, 2018 By Nathaly Pesantez

The Sunnyside Yard Steering Committee held its first meeting this week, signaling the start to the 18-month master planning process for a potentially massive development at the Sunnyside Yard site.

The approximately 35-member committee, made up of local leaders and stakeholders in an array of disciplines, met yesterday to begin discussing the master planning process and their role in helping the project’s technical consultant team design it, according to the city.

The city did not provide a breakdown of what was discussed in the first meeting, but noted that the committee will help provide a fresh perspective on what can and should be built over the 180-acre site, including outlining priorities for the first phase of potential development.

Sunnyside Yards Steering Committee (Click to Enlarge)

The committee, as first announced in May, will also work to figure out how to best engage the public in several interest areas related to development, ensuring that the existing communities priorities are made clear during the mater planning process.

Public meetings, workshops, and canvassing are all engagement activities the steering committee will likely conduct for public input.

The steering committee will also meet about every three months during the master planning process, which concludes roughly by the end of 2019, but could take up to two years.

“We are confident that the Steering Committee will help create an inclusive plan that could deliver on good jobs, affordable housing, open space and improved public transit in Western Queens,” said Cali Williams, Director of Sunnyside Yard, in a statement. “This is just the start of a conversation and we look forward to engaging New Yorkers in envisioning this unique site.”

The master plan, to be developed by the Practice for Architecture and Urbanism, along with other engineering and planning experts, is expected to detail features like residential units, affordability, schools, parkland, and more at the site, along with development phases and a potential timeline to carry the plan out.

The city, along with Amtrak, first announced their intention to produce a master plan for the site in May, just over a year after the Sunnyside Yard Feasibility Study was released.

The study said over 80 percent of the yard could potentially be decked over and developed with up to 24,000 residential units, 19 schools and 52 acres of public parks.

The yard has long been eyed for development, with Amtrak approaching the city in 2014 to discuss the possibility of a large-scale development above the yards.

email the author: [email protected]

42 Comments

Ross Rickenberg ,realtor

I think this should not only be built, but every building should be 70+ stories and we should open up the boarders and let more people in . This neighborhood is empty, it’s underpopulated and needs more people .




1



22
Reply
LIC RESIDENT CONCERNED

Land use Steering Committee,… I am worried here they are local stakeholders, regional thinkers and technical experts. What they are money grubbers, real estate industry people, CB-2 land use chairperson who is a VP and works for a RE Fund, the same people who have reviewed, approved the plans and permitted small hotels to be built in our district now housing hundreds of homeless in our neighborhood. Thousands of new apartments to be built – with the ultimate plan of moving NYCHA families into Sunnyside yards new apartments and tearing down the projects along the East River Waterfront, Ravenswood, to make room for luxury housing, etc. This has already been discussed in Real Estate circles as costs to refurbish the NYCHA housing upwards of $31 Billion dollars cheaper to relocate, warehouse/seal apartments with the excuse of asbestos/lead contamination, already happening….




8



2
Reply
Billy Goat Gruff

Before anything can be built a huge problem would need to be solved: how will all these people get to Manhattan everyday? 7 train?? hahahahaha!! Transportation first.




11



1
Reply
Anonymous

I’m with original Gardens Watcher and support the train yard park project




1



7
Reply
M Casey

Love the idea. Good opportunity for me to get a chance to look at the property and we can get it done.




1



5
Reply
anonymous

wow. appears that the southeast Asian community is not a part of this working group




1



1
Reply
Neziah Bliss

Build a subway line and you’ll get 80% approval for this project. If you can’t build a subway line over train tracks and pre-existing tunnels, then you can’t build one anywhere. Build another line!!!!




7



1
Reply
A.Bundy

you aint getting me to move for you to get on the 7 train. keep waiting another 30 minutes.




6



1
Reply
whaah

I’d support housing the 2x as dense if it means there would be a large public park similar in size to McCarren.

Developments should be 100% mixed-use though. If you don’t you’ll put more strain on the trains.




4



2
Reply
Gardens Watcher

I figured the Trump family would be involved with this much real estate at stake. Maybe you’ll call it Trumpville?




4



6
Reply
Bill

There needs to massive open public space/ parks but with the amount of schools, apartments etc being proposed I’m not holding my breadth. This is Western Queens’ last chance at becoming a real destination in the city similar to other neighborhoods- Park slope, Williamsburg etc. without the parks it will be just an extension of how awful Court Square is now- There is literally no reason to be there other than the multiple train lines to the city.




12



1
Reply
Gardens Watcher

I am the original Gardens Watcher, not the fake troll who said it was a “good plan”. Interesting that no one has ever stole my name until this story posted.




8



15
Reply
patricia dorfman

a non-negotiable 100 acres of continuous park sound good. that way, there is something good in it for queens, which should be the only reason at all for development which without infrastructure and that green space will wreck our lives, and remove the sky. will the the people we pay to lead us and steward the city now, and in the future work for us or for developers?




28



4
Reply
Eduardo

Immoral Society – yep, queens neighborhoods still need parking, ya putz. Where will those trucks that deliver your small-batch-hand-picked-local-artisanal coffee beans park?
If you didn’t know, these things don’t magically appear. Local amenities come with parking needs.




13



27
Reply
woofwoof

Good, more housing.

Any proposal will need a new rail line. Perhaps a trunk that branches after the yard. Can send the G and a new train down northern Blvd. Can also connect it to the abandoned Rockaway branch, giving Western Queens a one seat ride to JFK.




7



11
Reply
M Casey

I’d love it if they opened the Rockaway line. It would be the height of stupidity to remove a mass transit option in favor of a tourist attraction.




5



3
Reply
whaah

There is a push to build the park but it sounds like it’ll get squashed. The right of way is too important to give up.

I’d support a trail alongside the rail route though.




3



0
Reply
Native New Yorker

You are correct but to all those who want to reactivate the line as a subway extension, good luck with the NIMBYs who have literally extended their property fences into the right-of-way.




1



2
Reply
rikki

Radical Idea built no frill housing that is affordable for people making under $35 a year, and some for people making under $25k…1 bedroom for $750-1000 a month no amenities just an elevator basic sears w/d stove refridge, nothing luxury maybe a community pool and play area, nothing luxury i repeat nothing luxury




3



28
Reply
rikki

and we desperately need tens of thousands more basic housing units. Remember some of us are just not impressed with “luxury” countertops stainless appliances and a doggie valet in the complex. Some of us are fine with thick carpeting to keep the noise down and who cares about parquet floors? Saving $500 a month in rent is far more important then Faux luxury hipsterism.




0



12
Reply
John O'Reilly

Smart move by Committee organizers to not include elected politicians who would likely distort the process to suit their personal agenda.




8



5
Reply
Carbie Barbie

You’d rather have un-elected people control this? Like Robert Moses?




18



0
Reply
Apex

Make it into one of the most beautiful and sustainable park the world has ever seen.




23



2
Reply
Licer

Mr LaBarbera and Carlos Scissura are among the builders invested lobbyists here. Others have bland titles, but guess who will make money in the group?
As well, policing and educational, parks and traffic and congestion interests are absent. A new precinct and firehouse, roads and rail station?
City investments would cost billions, with a b, up front, and should. In fact, a new small town. Please stop now. Air and sky are not at the table




14



1
Reply
Darth Trader Joe's

24,000 residential units, 19 schools and 52 acres of public parks and 1 Trader Joe’s




10



3
Reply
Gardens Watcher

Oh what a surprise! There’s another “Gardens Watcher” out there spreading false posts to steer public opinion in favor of this boondoggle project. Could it be the committee, or the Mayor’s office or another pol, or even the trades who stand to make big bucks? Who’s monitoring this site anyway? Or is it just a bunch of trolls?




14



3
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

Recent News