You are reading

Phipps Faces Continued Objections as Zoning Process Moves Forward

Public hearing at Sunnyside Community Services

Public hearing at Sunnyside Community Services

May 24, 2016 By Christian Murray

More than 150 residents attended a public hearing last Wednesday to express their views on the controversial 10-story, 208-unit affordable housing development that is proposed to rise at 50-25 Barnett Ave.

The attendees, many of whom were long-time Phipps Gardens Apartments residents, largely panned the project—called The Barnett—at the meeting held at the Sunnyside Community Services Center.

They claimed the 10-story building was out of scale with the neighborhood; the development would lead to parking problems; it would put pressure on an already overstretched infrastructure; and that its so-called affordable apartments skewed too much toward higher income residents.

However, several supporters of the project also attended, arguing that there is a shortage of housing in the neighborhood and that this project will provide an additional supply of units at a reasonable rent level. They also charged that the scarcity of affordable housing is just as problematic as the stretched infrastructure.

Phipps Houses, a non-profit builder, needs the City to approve its application for a zoning change in order for the housing development to proceed. Wednesday’s public hearing was part of the application process Phipps must follow in order for the land to be rezoned from manufacturing to residential.

“This is a terrible idea and the building is way too big,” said a representative for the Sunnyside Gardens Preservation Alliance, who had generated 1,700 signatures against the proposal. “It’s a quality of life issue,” he added, claiming the schools are already overcrowded, subway service is already stretched and businesses nearby, such as Steve Madden, might suffer.

Gerald Perrin, 82, a life-long resident of Phipps Gardens Apartments, noted that the site that is going to be developed is presently used as a 225-space parking lot. He said Phipps Gardens Apartments has 472 units whose residents rely on that lot, as there is no off street parking associated with the development.

Existing lot

Existing lot

Perrin said the loss in parking would be devastating.

“The loss in parking would not just be a nightmare for us but it would ripple throughout the surrounding community,” he said.

“The Barnett” will include a 200-space parking lot. However, Phipps claims that only about half of them will be used by tenants, leaving 100 parking spaces left over for community use.

Adam Weinstein, the president of Phipps who was at the two-hour public hearing, had said at previous meetings that the company’s primary focus is on affordable housing—as opposed to managing the parking lot.

He said that Phipps was doing its best to alleviate the situation by building significantly more parking than what is required by zoning.

The impact of the development on traffic, parking, school seats, the 7 train and other infrastructure issues will all be studied during the environment review, which is part of the greater zoning application.

Dan Raymond, who recently formed the Queens Anti-Gentrification Group, claimed the development will lead to the displacement of the working class and immigrants.

Raymond said that Phipps is not really committed to affordable housing, claiming that “they are bringing rent stabilized and rent controlled apartments across the street [Phipps Gardens Apartments] up to market level.

“They don’t represent our interests, say no to Phipps Houses,” he said.

Phipps disputed this claim.

“Any suggestion that Phipps is actively deregulating Phipps Gardens Apartments is not based in reality. Due to a mix of turnover and renovations, only 13 apartments out of 472 apartments have been deregulated,” according to a spokesperson for the project.

MHG Architects

MHG Architects

Proponents of the development focused on displacement of local residents already taking place due to the lack of housing options.

“I live on 39th Avenue and I support the project because we have two young kids and I have many friends with young kids who have had to leave because they couldn’t afford to live in the neighborhood,” said Jenna Breing, a resident said.

“I think we need to think this through and make it work better for the community than just shut it down,” Breing said. “Shutting it down just means that more of our friends and neighborhoods will have to leave.”

Jack Freeman, a Sunnyside Gardens resident, said that the neighborhood has a housing shortage that is pushing people out and leading to higher rents, which the Phipps project can help solve.

“No one is being displaced by this and the rents are in the range of what is in the neighborhood,” Freeman said.

But the development was subject to criticism about who was eligible for the housing.

Several CB 2 members argued that the qualifying income levels for the “affordable” units skewed too high and that there were not enough units for lower-income residents.

Phipps, however, said that the affordable income limits selected were in accordance with the NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development Mixed Middle Income program.

Weinstein said there are programs where all of the units could be offered at 60 percent of Area Median Income. However, he said the program selected was more appropriate for Sunnyside.

Adam Weinstein, Michael Wadman (L-R)

Adam Weinstein, Michael Wadman (L-R)

Michael Wadman, vice president of Phipps Houses, told participants that there would be a 50 percent preference for members who live in the Community Board 2 district (which includes Sunnyside, Woodside and Long Island City) and outlined the overall income limits.

Twenty percent (42 units) of the apartments will be for residents who earn at or below 50 percent of Area Media Income, he said. That equates to about $32,000 for a single person or about $45,000 for a family of four, according to 2015 Housing and Urban Development figures.

Thirty percent (62 units) will be for those who earn at or below 100 percent of AMI. The maximum amount an individual applicant can earn is about $64,000, while for a family of four it is $91,000.

Fifty percent (104 units) are for residents who earn up to 130 percent of AMI. The maximum amount for an individual is about $83,000, while it is about $118,000 for a family of four.

Lisa Deller, the head of CB 2’s land use committee, said that a significant number of people who reside in this district fall between the 50 percent and 100 percent income thresholds and would not be eligible to apply.

Pat O’Brien, chair of CB 2, said, “You are eliminating an enormous amount of the people in this neighborhood who we speak on behalf of who would not be eligible to apply.”

CB 2 will take a vote on the Phipps plan on June 2 during its monthly meeting that is scheduled be held at Sunnyside Community Services at 7 p.m. Its decision is only advisory.

The project then moves to the Queens Borough President for an advisory vote, and then the City Planning Commission and City Council, both of which have the capacity to nix the project.

The City Council’s decision will essentially be determined by Councilman Jimmy Van Bramer, since it is Council protocol for members to follow the recommendation of the local representative.

Van Bramer has stated previously that he has “concerns” about the project.


email the author:


Click for Comments 
Southside is a slum

I agree. But magically it’s going to end up like everything else. Overpriced apartments. Lisa dealers comments are the warning sign. Mr Obrien hits the nail on the head. In the end of the day it’s all about the dollar. All smoke and mirrors here, it’s going to get done and its gonna be costly

Screwed again

I hope it gets done and the people who currently reside in this area that are getting pushed out by this rent crisis get first crack at the apartments. Their the lifelong residents who really deserve it. I know a building of that size might get the neighborhood people frantic that this nice homey little area is going be exploited with other major buildings going up and ruin the coziness of the area but if this is done right, it’s beats the alternative of having to be priced out of your area. With that said, I feel the right thing never gets done when politicians and developer’s get together. It’s like a kinks song, all you ever get is a definite maybe. In the long run greed wins out.


They’ve been begging for good press. Won’t fool anyone who lives around here.


Is there any possibility of converting the empty building on 48th and Barnett into a multilevel parking garage?


based on what i’ve read in the comments of the sunnyside post the only thing that the citizens of sunnyside care about is parking.

irish lassy

there is a big article about JVB in Queens Crap today from “Progressive” everyone should read it very informative and very true — it is about the libraries –

Jimmy Van Pooch

JVB’s big concern is whether the public will swallow more of his baloney when his master Bill de Blasio tells Jimmy the Phipps project has to happen, albeit with a few cosmetic changes. JVB’s touting of the minor changes made to the Mayor’s recent zoning proposals for Mandatory Inclusionary Housing and ZQA completely ignored the major problems with public infrastructure flowing from increased density resulting from the zoning changes. JVB’s pointing the finger at the BSA for the 17 story hotel/future homeless shelter on Queens Blvd requires the public to believe that the Majority Leader has no influence with this municipal agency. Chirlane McCray’s group, The Fund To Advance New York City, is a major benefactor of the Phipps organization and there’s no way the Mayor will not push the Barnett Ave project through. How will JVB explain to the public that he got steam rolled by the Mayor? More baloney, of course.





He had better move to Adam Weinstein’s neighborhood if he votes to destroy Sunnyside Gardens by allowing that lot to be rezoned. Every single owner of a lot back there will apply for the same rezoning and that will be the end of the “garden city.”


The lot directly east of the Phipps lot was home for 55 years to a dry cleaning supply business. The soil and water beneath are saturated with dry cleaning fluid according to the NY State Department of Conservation. Current residents have been subject to those vapors for decades without any notification from our civic leaders. Any building on top of that chemical stew will house those vapors through “soil vapor intrusion.” Another instance of big business and government colluding to make money by telling people “we’ve got it under control,” when nothing could be further from the truth. The will be guilty of crimes against human life if they build a ten story building on top of polluted land and water and 30 feet from the busiest commuter railroad in the country. What is the matter with their brains? Oh, I forgot. Greed is one of the Seven Deadly Sins, isn’t it?


The progs will vote for him anyway as they heart Castro . You give them too much credit


I am not sure if these should really be called affordable. I live a block from the Phipps Apartments and, at market rate, pay $1000 less then the cheapest two bedroom in the complex. This really seems like an excuse for developers to make a buck on the back of the community. Everybody should remember the JVB can kill this in the city council if he wants to.


I guarantee that if it was affordable housing aka the projects people would still be complaining. Can’t please everyone.


Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Crunching the Queens crime numbers: grand larcenies down across borough, rapes halved in the north, robberies decrease in the south

Apr. 17, 2024 By Ethan Marshall

The number of grand larcenies across Queens was down during the 28-day period from March 18 to April 14, compared to the same period of time last year, according to the latest crime stats released by the NYPD Monday. At the same time, rapes and robberies decreased significantly in northern and southern Queens, respectively.