You are reading

NYC Announces Sweeping Changes to Middle, High School Application Process

Mayor Bill de Blasio and Chancellor Richard Carranza announced major changes to the way students will be admitted to middle and high schools this year. Michael Appleton/Mayoral photography office

This story was originally published by Chalkbeat, a nonprofit news organization covering public education. Sign up for their newsletters here:

The coronavirus pandemic will force major changes in the ways students are admitted to New York City’s competitive middle and high schools this year, the education department announced on Friday.

Middle schools will not use test scores or other academic “screens” to select students, auditions for performing arts schools are going virtual, and the controversial Specialized High School Admissions Test will be administered in middle schools across the city, rather than at just a handful of campuses.

The city will also eliminate a district-based admissions preference that has allowed some of the city’s wealthiest ZIP codes to carve out a set of its own elite high schools.

New York City is home to one of the most segregated school systems in the country, a status driven partly by its admissions practices. For years, integration advocates have been pushing the city to revamp the competitive and stressful process for the city’s 10- and 13-year-olds, which often favors more affluent families that have the time and savvy to navigate it.

De Blasio has proved reluctant to pursue citywide reform until, late into his final term, the pandemic forced his hand. An overhaul became inevitable in the wake of the health crisis as the main data points used to screen — last year’s fourth and seventh grade state tests, grades, and attendance — were put on pause or dramatically changed.

Some of the changes now going into effect could set the city on a path towards more diverse schools. In addition to the new admissions policies, the city is opening applications for grants for five more districts to pursue integration plans on their own — bringing the total to 10 districts.

One of the most explosive admissions debates remains unresolved, however. A decision has still not been made about applying to the city’s gifted & talented programs for elementary schools. Entry to these coveted programs hinges on a standardized test given to preschoolers, administered one-on-one by a proctor. It could prove difficult to administer safely in the midst of rising coronavirus cases across the city. Moving the process online would raise equity issues, since thousands of students lack access to devices or reliable internet.

Now that schools and families know how the process will work, the city must communicate the changes widely and clearly, said Karuna Patel, deputy director of the Feerick Center, which has advised the education department on ways to make the admissions system more fair. Otherwise, families who have traditionally struggled to make sense of the process could be at a disadvantage.

“You can imagine the flow of information, if it’s not coming through DOE well, it’s really going to exacerbate the problems we’re talking about. Who does best in a system where information is king?” she said. “They really need to be thoughtful about how to implement this.”

Sweeping changes for middle schools

The most sweeping changes will affect middle schools.

All middle schools will pause their use of academic screens for one year, the education department said. Around 40 percent of middle schools currently accept students based on their academic records. Schools that don’t have enough seats for all applicants will base admissions on a lottery.

There is precedent for such a move: Brooklyn’s District 15 recently eliminated screening at its middle schools in favor of a lottery. The aim was to create more diverse schools, and early data show progress towards that goal. But Brooklyn’s plan includes something that the city’s does not: a priority geared towards admitting students who represent the district’s racial and economic diversity.

It’s possible that a citywide lottery for middle schools does not change school demographics significantly. Without an explicit focus on admitting a diverse group of students, admissions systems based purely on choice often fall short of integration goals. District 1 on the Lower East Side had such a system, and its schools were deeply segregated. Parents recently lobbied to add admissions priorities to the lottery to encourage more diversity.

The education department said that district priorities will remain in place, which give students an admissions preference based on where they live, in order to allow younger students to attend schools closer to home. Schools like those in District 15, which give other preferences that aren’t based on academic records, will be allowed to keep those intact.

The elimination of middle school screens will only be for one year. With Mayor Bill de Blasio term-limited, that could turn school integration and admissions policy into an issue on the campaign trail to replace him. At both the middle- and high school-level, selective admissions practices have been credited with drawing white and more affluent families into the public school system, and many parents who have managed to navigate the system well have fought to preserve it.

Middle school applications will open the week of Jan. 11, and close the week of Feb. 8th.

High schools to continue screening

High schools will still be allowed to screen students, relying on academic records from before the health crisis struck. But the most notable change is the immediate elimination of district admissions priorities. New York City’s high school application process was designed to open access to students regardless of their ZIP codes. But some schools across the city give priority to those students living within their own district. Nowhere is it more controversial — and fiercely guarded — than Manhattan’s District 2.

Spanning TriBeCa to the Upper East Side, the district is one of the whitest and most affluent, and students who live there have been given admissions preference at a handful of coveted high schools. Those schools are especially segregated, with almost quadruple the enrollment of white students compared to the citywide average. Recently, principals at four schools that offer District 2 priority called on the city to eliminate it, in the hopes of enrolling a more diverse student body.

For next year’s admission cycle, the city plans to do away with any other geographic priorities, including admissions preferences given to students within the school’s borough.

The changes may not amount to much when it comes to school integration since schools can still screen students. New York City has a higher share of “screened” schools than anywhere else in the country, meaning many of the most sought-after programs admit students based on their academic records. Getting accepted to these schools is often a competitive and complicated process, and screened programs tend to enroll fewer Black, Latino, and low-income students.

The city is taking steps to make the process more transparent and streamlined: High schools will be required to post their long-shrouded admissions rubrics publicly, and the education department, instead of schools themselves, will be responsible for ranking where applicants fall on acceptance lists.

High school applications will open the week of Jan. 18. The deadline will be the week of Feb. 22.

The SHSAT will go on

Students will take the entrance exam for specialized high schools —  widely regarded as the Ivy League of public high schools — at their own middle schools. Registration for the exam begins on Dec. 21 and closes on Jan. 15. The test will be administered starting the week of Jan. 27.

Eighth graders who opted to attend school in person this year will take the test alongside their “cohorts,” the group of children in their classes, to account for social distancing and limit possible exposure to the coronavirus and cut down on the need to travel to take the test. Most New York City students, however, have chosen to learn exclusively from home. It was not immediately clear whether accommodations will be made for those students.

One of the city’s most heated admissions debates has long centered on the specialized high schools like Stuyvesant and Brooklyn Tech, which admit students based solely on the results of a single test.

De Blasio launched a campaign to eliminate the test, which is required by state law. He faced a wave of protest and a lawsuit. Pushback has been particularly fierce among Asian parents, whose children make up a majority of enrollment in the specialized schools.

But many blame the exam for excluding other students of color. The schools enroll only about 10% Black and Hispanic students, who together make up almost 70% of enrollment citywide. Integration advocates have lobbied the legislature to do away with the exam, and argued that the ongoing pandemic makes it unsafe to administer in person.

The city could likely do away with the exam at five of the eight schools that require it (a ninth specialized high school for performing arts requires auditions), though mayor de Blasio has disputed that.

Auditions pivot to online

Students trying out for performing and visual arts programs — including the famed LaGuardia High School of Music and Art and the Performing Arts in Manhattan and Queens’ Frank Sinatra School of the Arts — will submit their applications virtually. Students will record themselves singing, dancing, or performing monologues, or take pictures of their work.

Some schools posted about the new online process on their websites, but the education department said at the time that the information shared prematurely and hadn’t been finalized. It’s unclear whether middle schools will also pivot to remote auditions, or whether the change only applies to high schools.

Chalkbeat is a nonprofit news site covering educational change in public schools.

email the author: [email protected]


Click for Comments 

This is a good idea he understands that schools in poorer neighborhoods have worse education so selective schools will always get a higher percentage of wealthier students when all kids deserve a chance! hopefully he can boost education in poorer neighborhoods but this is a decent start.

Just the facts ma’am

You’re absolutely right. I have friends who teach and the poor neighborhoods have kids that threaten teachers and actually will attack teachers. Show up to class eating fast food or play with their smartphone and the teachers can’t do anything because the chancellor want to coddle the kids. This year, every student gets a pass. No exception. Kids refuse to turn their video on when remote learning. Teachers can’t do anything to them.

How are these kids going to succeed in the specialized high schools? It’s ridiculous.

We’re all pretending parents all teach their kids education especially the poor that education is the only way to not stay poor. These kids literally don’t care.

The poor black kids that have the motivation should absolutely have access to extra after school teaching and access to test prep.

It’s a shame that rich neighborhoods have better schools. Look at schools in wealthy neighborhoods in Jersey. There’s a large sports fields and even swimming pool. The parking lot are filled with luxury cars driven by rich students. The teachers drive cheaper cars.

Reality check

The reason why schools in the suburbs have big sports fields and swimming pools is because of high property taxes. This is why people move to the there.

Concerned Citizen

Let them fail. People have a choice. It’s survival of the fittest. Those who care about study with discipline will excel and run the world. They made their choice.


With so many families leaving NYC in affluent neighborhoods schools have to fill up somehow. The way to do that is to get rid of school zones and academic requirements.

Just the facts ma’am

Sarah, I’m sorry but it’s this complete denial of reality that only perpetuates poor black underachievement. You’re telling me by allowing underachieving kids with poor attitudes will somehow thrive all of a sudden in these academically rigorous environments?

Do you seriously think if I gave you a full scholarship to medical school or MIT for hard sciences you honestly can say you’re going to graduate even with an average gpa? I had smart friends who went to college and couldn’t even pass first semester of physics and had to change majors.


We will probably need more specialized educational services and security guards in all public schools now.


If the schools spent as much time on teaching instead of all this diversity maybe all the students could learn


You can play all the games you want with these poor dumb kids. Universities will not dumb down their curriculum and employers will not dumb down their professions. All universities and colleges should eliminate remedial classes. If you are not at college level, then you should not be accepted.

Concerned Citizen

Exactly! Academic competition is the only way to make sure the best of the best prosper and are able to compete with their international counterparts.


Uneducated kids don’t suddenly get smart by mixing in with smart kids, in fact opposite will happen. Uneducated and potentially troublesome kids will affect smart kids education.

You educate uneducated by providing quality education to ghetto neighborhoods, not by mixing them up regardless of zone. Our education system needs overhaul how they educate kids and how they are prepared for real life. Not by abolishing zoning or tests or scores. If your kids is not into school, he may be handy or might act or can play instrument. Find the strengths. One size doesn’t fit all.


And then they’ll breakdown sports ,nothing like a 300 pound sprinters plus everybody gets a medal.

Concerned Citizen

Sounds about progressives. Progressives can’t stand that there are people better off so they gotta dumb it down so that no one has a competitive advantage. The progressive slogan should be “make everyone poor and mediocre at best”


Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Op-ed: An urgent call for revising NY’s criminal justice reforms to protect public safety

Apr. 11, 2024 By Council Member Robert Holden

In 2019, the State Legislature and Governor Andrew Cuomo embarked on a controversial overhaul of New York’s criminal justice system by enacting several laws, including cashless bail and sweeping changes to discovery laws. Simultaneously, the New York City Council passed laws that compounded these challenges, notably the elimination of punitive segregation in city jails and qualified immunity for police officers. These actions have collectively undermined public safety and constrained law enforcement effectiveness.