You are reading

Non-Citizen Voting Law Struck Down, Draws Strong Reaction From Queens Officials

Polling site at St. Sebastian’s school in Woodside (Queens Post)

June 28, 2022 By Christian Murray

A New York City law that extended voting rights to as many as 800,000 non-citizen New Yorkers was struck down by a Staten Island supreme court judge Monday—and Queens officials’ reactions were mixed.

The law, which was passed by the city council by a 33-14 margin in December, granted green card holders and residents authorized to work with the right to vote in municipal elections—such as for mayor, public advocate, comptroller and their local council member.

Supporters of the law argue that hundreds of thousands of immigrants pay taxes and should therefore have a say in who runs the city.

“We are disappointed by today’s ruling,” said Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who also represents Jamaica and surrounding Queens neighborhoods. “The Council passed Local Law 11 to enfranchise nearly one million voters, many Black and brown New Yorkers, who live here, pay taxes, and contribute to our city. We are reviewing the ruling and exploring options for moving forward.”

The legislation, however, was ruled unconstitutional by Supreme Court Justice Ralph Porzio in response to a lawsuit brought by Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella and several mostly Republican officials.

In Queens, Republican Council Members Joann Ariola and Vickie Paladino signed onto the lawsuit, as well as Democrat Council Member Robert Holden. Holden was the only Democratic lawmaker to be a plaintiff in the suit.

Republican Council Members Joann Ariola and Vickie Paladino as well as Democrat Council Member Robert Holden have signed onto a lawsuit with leaders of the New York state Republican Party arguing that the new law is unconstitutional.

Republican Council Members Joann Ariola and Vickie Paladino as well as Democrat Council Member Robert Holden signed onto the lawsuit with leaders of the New York state Republican Party arguing that the new law is unconstitutional.

Holden, who represents Council District 30, told the Queens Post in January that he joined the lawsuit because “citizenship and suffrage have always been tied together for good reason, and must never be torn from each other.”

He also criticized a stipulation in the law that only requires noncitizens to live in the city for 30 days prior to a local election.

Following the ruling, Holden praised the decision.

“I applaud today’s court decision in favor of our bi-partisan lawsuit, affirming what we already knew: non-citizen voting in NY is a violation of law. It’s a victory for citizens’ rights and will encourage permanent residents to pursue citizenship and fully commit to our nation.”

But most representatives in Queens expressed disappointment in the wake of the ruling and are advocating for the case to be appealed.

“Today’s decision, to deny the right of almost one million immigrant New Yorkers to fully participate in our democracy, is shameful. We will stand firm with our immigrant communities as we appeal this ruling. Our voices will not be ignored,” said Councilmember Shekar Krishnan, who represents Jackson Heights and Elmhurst and was part of rally at City Hall Monday to denounce the Court’s decision.

Councilmember Julie Won, who represents western Queens, also criticized the ruling.

“Today’s ruling in a Staten Island court will disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of immigrant New Yorkers that give so much love and labor to our city, pay taxes, and simply want to have a vote in our democracy,” she tweeted.

Queens Borough President Donovan Richards said the ruling would affect a large numbers of borough residents. Nearly half the residents of Queens were born outside the country.

“Today’s ruling is yet another attempt to further disenfranchise our immigrant neighbors and erase years of tireless advocacy to ensure our government is fully representative of the people it serves,” Richards said. “Our city is a stronger, fairer place when our immigrant communities are brought into the political process, allowing our diverse neighborhoods to fully exercise their power. I fully support any appeal of this ruling to a higher court.”

The lawsuit filed by the plaintiffs argued that the law violates Article 2, Section 1, of the state constitution, which grants the right to vote in all elections to “every citizen” 18 years of age or older.

Advocates for the bill, however, argued that the law was constitutional since it didn’t provide noncitizens with the right to vote in state or national elections.

The judge, however, agreed with the plaintiffs.

Justice Porzio said that the city can’t give noncitizens the right to vote since the state constitution holds that only “citizens” are eligible.  He also said the measure was also in violation of sections of the state’s Election Law and Municipal Home Rule Law.

Paladino celebrated the ruling and issued a statement on twitter.

“I’m very proud to announce our lawsuit against non-citizen voting in New York was successful. A huge thank you to minority leader Borelli for spearheading the effort, and the countless activists from all walks of life who helped make it happen. Chalk one up for common sense.”

email the author: news@queenspost.com

16 Comments

Click for Comments 
What's the point anymore?

We don’t have to because citizens to vote anymore. What is the bloody point?

8
2
Reply
Gullible Republicans believe myths fairytales and conspiracy theories

Brandon -Didn’t you even bother to read the article? The law if passed “ The law, which was passed by the city council by a 33-14 margin in December, granted green card holders and residents authorized to work with the right to vote in municipal elections—such as for mayor, public advocate, comptroller and their local council member.” No mention of New York’s 14th Congressional District.

4
6
Reply
Ed

No councilman Krishnan it’s not shameful. Where does it say that non citizens have a right to vote. Next thing you will be saying that it’s shameful illegal aliens can’t vote. Get off your high horse you don’t own the moral high ground.

21
2
Reply
Bill

These politicians are just angry because they will lose voters. You can vote when you become a citizen. Tough luck!

26
2
Reply
Billy

Bill, so those politicians aren’t really losing votes are they? They’re just “deferred” votes and voters.

Reply
JD

I’m very pleased with Justice Porzio’s decision in this matter. I’m disappointed in how so many Council Members would vote for a law that so clearly violates the New York State Constitution. Keep in mind, a Permanent Resident only needs to wait five years before they can apply for US Citizenship – even less time if they’re married to a US Citizen or have served in the military. Waiting five years – or in certain cases less time – is a small price to pay for US Citizenship and the right to vote for the rest of one’s life.

26
2
Reply
The courts get it right again

As an American Citizen, are there any countries where I can go and vote in their elections? Will the governments of China, Mexico, Guatemala, the Philippines or New Zealand, for example, allow me to cast a ballot as a foreign national in their elections?

I didn’t think so.

This is a cheap and cynical ploy by democrats to dredge up a few votes by devaluing American citizenship.

Despicable.

26
3
Reply
Sunnyside Bill

New Zealand lets permanent residents vote. Republicans once again openly demonstrate their ignorance.

You have the world’s collective knowledge literally in the palm of your hand and yet you choose to be a dunce.

5
15
Reply
Anonymous

How dare anyone not know about New Zealand’s voting laws. Since New Zealand was brought up, check the rules for immigration to said country. They seem perfectly reasonable to me.

8
3
Reply
Does New Zealand border a war-torn country

…with thousands of refugees? No? So a little different then.

4
2
Reply
Madd Donna

Both parties are corrupt. But Republicans are way worse. Gerrymandering and the latest worst crime against our nation – Trump’s ploy to overturn the Presidential election let alone how our once Supreme Court has now become the Federalist Society Court! The American people have been conned all along!!

2
2
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

City Council passes bill shifting broker fee burden to landlords, sparking backlash from real estate industry and key critics

Nov. 14, 2024 By Ethan Stark-Miller and QNS News Team

The New York City Council passed a landmark bill on Wednesday, aiming to relieve renters of paying hefty broker fees — a cost that will now fall on the party who hires the listing agent. Known as the FARE Act (Fairness in Apartment Rentals), the legislation passed with a veto-proof majority of 42-8, despite opposition from Republicans and conservative Democrats.