You are reading

MTA Eyes Congestion Pricing Toll of Up to $23 Per Vehicle Trip into Manhattan

Drivers snake their way through Times Square this summer. Ben Fractenberg/THE CITY

Logo for THE CITY

This article was originally published by The CITY on Aug. 10

The years-long effort to toll vehicles in the most congested parts of Manhattan as a way to bankroll billions of dollars in mass-transit improvements and reduce traffic is no longer stuck in neutral.

Today officials released the long-delayed “environmental assessment” of the proposed Central Business District Tolling Program — touting how it could potentially cut congestion coming into the core of Manhattan by nearly 20%, improve air quality, boost bus service reliability and increase mass transit usage.

The document also outlined what the program may cost drivers entering the toll zone: between $5 and $23 per trip, depending on the time of day and the type of vehicle.

The shift would change truck traffic in Manhattan, in particular; the report estimates truck trips through the central district would drop between 55% and 81% as drivers opt for less expensive routes. But it acknowledged that tolls could increase the number of drivers diverting onto roads in the South Bronx and on Staten Island.

Initially approved in 2019 by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the state legislature, the rollout of so-called congestion pricing has been repeatedly hampered by federal bureaucracy, including hundreds of highly detailed questions from the feds that pushed back the projected launch date.

But the program that aims to fund $15 billion of subway, bus and commuter rail improvements as part of the MTA’s 2020 to 2024 Capital Plan now appears to be on track, with virtual public hearings set for later this month.

“Bottom line: this is good for the environment, good for public transit and good for New York and the region,” Janno Lieber, MTA chairperson and CEO, said in a statement.

In hundreds of pages made public early today, the Federal Highway Administration, the MTA Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority and the city and state transportation departments detailed how congestion pricing could reduce the number of vehicles entering Manhattan’s central business district between 15% and 20% — and also help the struggling mass transit system.

Midday traffic rolls down Seventh Ave in Midtown this week. Hiram Alejandro Durán/THE CITY

“Millions of riders are counting on a rapid, robust congestion pricing program that delivers essential reliability and accessibility upgrades,” said Danny Pearlstein, policy director for Riders Alliance, an advocacy group. “It can’t happen soon enough.”

For Whom the Bill Tolls

The assessment spells out, in seven different tolling scenarios, how much motorists may have to pay to enter Manhattan south of 60th Street — with potential rates for non-commercial vehicles ranging from $9 to $23 during peak periods and from $5 to $12 during the overnight hours.

Different vehicle classes would pay different tolls, with the peak E-ZPass rate for small trucks ranging between $12 and $65. For small trucks with E-ZPass, the peak rate could be between $12 and $82.

Overall, about 95% of drivers passing through toll stations run by the MTA use E-ZPass, according to a senior MTA official.

Commercial drivers are wary of the added costs.

“It will impact my company,” said Constantine Savagious, 37, an HVAC technician who was unloading a truck near Penn Station. “They will likely raise the rates for clients who hire them.”

Seven tolling scenarios, from the multi-agency summary of the congestion pricing environmental impact statement. MTA

Tolls would also be higher, officials said, on city DOT-designated “Gridlock Alert Days,” which typically coincide with occasions such as the United Nations General Assembly and the holiday season.

The 2019 state law that spurred the current iteration of congestion pricing made three categories of drivers exempt from the tolls: Emergency vehicles, vehicles transporting people with disabilities and any vehicle belonging to families living inside the Manhattan congestion pricing zone in which the household earns $60,000 or less per year.

State Sen. Leroy Comrie (D-Queens), who oversees a committee with oversight of the MTA, pushed back in January against other proposed breaks, saying “there should be no exemptions.”

But a New Jersey Congressman has threatened to “defund” the MTA’s use of federal dollars unless Garden State motorists receive credit for tolls.

The MTA’s environmental assessment outlined some additional potential loopholes, including one scenario that would exempt taxis, but not for-hire vehicles like an Uber car. Two of the seven scenarios exempt taxis from tolls, and three of seven scenarios exempt city buses. (In the cases where buses are tolled, the MTA would effectively be paying itself; revenue from those fees would move from the MTA’s operation budget into its capital budget, which pays for big infrastructure projects, a senior transit official said.)

The documents spell out the impact of congestion pricing on everything from subway stations expected to take on more riders because of reduced traffic to an expected drop in revenue for yellow taxis between 0.3% and 5% in the New York metro region.

The ripple effects of congestion pricing could affect how riders move through subway stations like Times Square, shown here this week. Hiram Alejandro Durán/THE CITY

Since 2009, all taxi trips have included a 50-cent surcharge to help the MTA. In 2019, a $2.50 congestion surcharge was added to all taxi trips south of 96th Street in Manhattan. Drivers of for-hire vehicles, such as Uber, limousines and green taxis, pay $2.75 per trip.

MB Hosain, a cabbie for 15 years, said congestion pricing could help unclog city streets, but worried it will also drive away passengers from hailing trips on taxis.

“They will see the price on the meters and decide they want to come out of the car because the trip is too expensive,” said Hosain, who was waiting to pick up fares on the Seventh Avenue taxi line outside Penn Station.

Bhairavi Desai, executive director of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance, said congestion pricing would be “absolutely crushing” for a transportation sector struggling to bounce back from the pandemic.

“Another congestion surcharge would mean drivers are working to pay taxes rather than to earn an income,” Desai told THE CITY. “It’s a debtor’s prison.”

Faster Subway Escalators?

At some subway stations — including Court Square and Flushing-Main Street in Queens and 14th Street-Union Square and Times Square-42nd Street — the assessment found that an expected shift of drivers to mass transit “would affect passenger flows with the potential for adverse effects” at certain staircases or escalators.

At Times Square-42nd Street, if ridership increases during peak period, the MTA may have to remove a center handrail from the staircase between the station mezzanine and the uptown platform for the 1/2/3 lines.

To keep up with an expected influx of riders at the No. 7 line’s Queens terminal at Flushing-Main Street, the assessment notes that the MTA would have to increase the speed on an escalator connecting the station mezzanine with the street from 100 feet per minute to 120 feet per minute.

“In the case of Flushing-Main Street, there is an escalator that would be affected, depending upon scenario,” the senior MTA official said. “And again, we have a mitigation.”

The same speed increase could also be needed at a 14th Street-Union Square escalator that connects the L line’s platform to the mezzanine inside the sprawling subway complex.

Rachael Fauss, a senior research analyst with Reinvent Albany, told THE CITY that congestion pricing is “urgent” for a transit system that has more than $50 billion of upgrades planned as part of the current five-year capital program. The watchdog group has said the plan is off to a notably slow start.

“The MTA originally budgeted to have congestion pricing revenues start arriving in 2021, so getting funding in ASAP remains urgent,” she said. “It is also exactly the type of reliable, environmentally beneficial revenue the MTA needs to fund its capital program.”

THE CITY is an independent, nonprofit news outlet dedicated to hard-hitting reporting that serves the people of New York.

email the author: news@queenspost.com

33 Comments

Click for Comments 
John

Why not just look I to saving money by cracking down in the mta fraud and the theft? Instead they just take more money. And let’s face it, this is just a long island tax. Because with this there is now no way to leave LI without paying. People in the Bronx still have their free bridges.. why?

6
1
Reply
Rita S.

John- I agree 100% reg MTA fraud . If the public knew how much $ is wasted on payroll ex: my friend works at MTA Bus Depot in Maspeth half of them sleeping in offices & getting paid. Its a job that he truly loves. Yes if MTA cuts down on their end there be a lot of money. Hope this congestion pricing DOES NOT Go Through

Reply
You're an idiot.

They are taxing the cars and other vehicles on the road!!

Stay in Long Island
We don’t need any more morons here.

Reply
ozzy ellis

Ridiculous – besides everything else how are disabled people needing taxis to go doctor appointments in Manhattan and people on fixed incomes etc. Ridiculous – put a small toll on the 59th St bridge if need be but STOP hurting the public in general –

8
2
Reply
Steven Roberts

There driving the middle class out of the city Colorado here i come clean fresh air friendiy people beautiful open spaces and many other beautiful attractions .

19
2
Reply
Steve Roberts

Lisa I’ve lived here for 70 years . Now I see rats in the street bikes and motorcycles on the sidewalk a women punched on the 7 train the list goes on and on your welcome to it. And I use my full name in my comments

4
1
Reply
Steven Roberts

That would be nice maybe we could see some of the old crowd. And talk about the old days.

Reply
Concerned Citizen

I will continue taking lyft even if they add and extra 23 bucks. I will never step inside a subway again. I am not risking my life in the lawless wastelands of the subways to save an extra 23 dollars.

19
5
Reply
Lisa

Cowardice induced by rightwing media. Snap out of it. The city was five times worse in the 90s. This is hysteria. Get a goddam grip.

3
9
Reply
Steven Roberts

Lisa in thr 90 s there were co ed volleyball women’s softball men’s basketball and softball there was a night league down Torney field.

2
1
Reply
A Commuters Tax would be better

So the state legislature got rid of the commuters tax 20 years ago which taxed out of city residents who worked in nyc but didn’t live in nyc.

And now, the geniuses (the powers that be) have decided to tax everyone including nyc residents to drive into Manhattan? What exactly are my nyc property and income taxes used for then?

Here’s an idea, how about just reinstating the commuters tax and make out of state residents who use nyc services to get to work pay to help keep up the infrastructure in nyc?

36
2
Reply
anonsunnysider

this is going to hurt the working class the most. The wealthy will continue to drive through with no problem. Another money grab from the city – apparently they don’t take enough from us. How can we boycott this?

26
4
Reply
Larry Penner

Elected officials on all levels of government will lobby for discounts or exemptions for police officers, fire fighters, teachers, low income, NYC outer borough residency, seniors, physically disabled. small commercial delivery businesses, users of electric vehicles, residents living below 60th Street in Manhattan or other special niches. These discounts or exemptions will be adopted to placate their constituents when running for reelection in 2023 or 2024. More discounts translates to less revenues. Nobody can predict if anywhere near $1 billion in annual toll revenues will actually appear..

The MTA has scheduled virtual public hearings in August. For months, all of the MTA Board and Committee Meetings held at MTA HQ, in Manhattan have been in person along with virtual. Why not the same for these public hearings? .

How will Governor Kathy Hochul assist the MTA in making up for billions in previously anticipated congestion price tolling that may not appear until 2024 along with previously canceled scheduled fare increase revenues?. Ditto for additional costs due to inflation, lost revenues due to ongoing fare evasion and upcoming union contracts? Labor will want salary increases that at a minimum keep pace with growing inflation. Last year, inflation was 4%. This year, it has grown to 8%. The MTA previously budgeted only 2% per year for the next round of labor contracts.. . .

(Larry Penner — transportation advocate, historian and writer who previously worked for the Federal Transit Administration Region 2 New York Office. This included the development, review, approval and oversight for billions in capital projects and programs for the MTA, NYC Transit, Long Island & Metro North Rail Roads MTA Bus, NYC DOT, New Jersey Transit along with 30 other transit agencies in NY & NJ)..
.

9
2
Reply
lucky number 7 train

Born and raised here. My voting will be with my feet. sad its that way. sp hates me, will be surprised if this comment is posted. They hate free speech.

13
5
Reply
Your comment isn't really relevant then?

Bummer, but that means you’re not a New Yorker then, so please save your comments for the Atlanta Post.

5
5
Reply
Lisa

Good riddance. You’re a suburbanite by temperament anyway. Enjoy Long Island traffic. You’re gonna love it.

9
15
Reply
simple

lisa, It’s funny that you think someone who is a native to NYC and wants to move that they would be moving to Long Island. lol! that’s so small minded. Have you even ever left the country? why is your world so small?

Reply
Lisa

Sugar, it’s not that LI is the only place to go, it’s that this particular commenter is small minded enough to fit in out there with juuuuuust right.

5
3
Reply
lucky number 7 train

Lisa- So in your world if someone leaves NYC they must be becoming a suburbanite who is living in Long Island. Me thinks someone is from Long Island and didn’t likey.
This is a big beautiful country and world with many beautiful cities and places. Life is short and I’m gonna try and enjoy as much as possible. Enjoy your subway rides, I know I have for 45 years.

7
2
Reply
Lisa

Girl, have fun in whatever suburban nightmare you move to. Florida sucks, but it’s probably right for you. Lots of crabby old folks for you to feel right at home with. Enjoy this 4:30 early bird dinner specials. Just watch out for the gators, hurricanes, heatwaves, flooding, klansmen and nazis down there.

5
3
Reply
lucky number 7 train

lol! again you think because I’m moving out of NYC I’m moving to the suburbs? or staying in the country.
Also for some reason because a person is moving from a place they where born a raised and have lived their entire, but is ready for a change you assume they are some right winger nazi. Your nasty bitterness is sad and is unfortunately to common in this city. Good luck and enjoy your congestion pricing.

3
1
Steven Roberts

Lisa why are so critical of others. All you do is make derogatory comments of others have you lived in any of these places. Putting other people down or there choices is small minded you seem like you are a very unhappy person. And afraid to use your full name

Lisa

Aw, did I hurt your feelings and make you want to use a bad word? I bet you’re one of the “eff your feelings”
crowd. Can dish it out but you can’t take it. So sad. You’ll be happier in the cookie cutter burbs with the rest of the Karen patrol. Bye!

1
3
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

City Council passes bill shifting broker fee burden to landlords, sparking backlash from real estate industry and key critics

Nov. 14, 2024 By Ethan Stark-Miller and QNS News Team

The New York City Council passed a landmark bill on Wednesday, aiming to relieve renters of paying hefty broker fees — a cost that will now fall on the party who hires the listing agent. Known as the FARE Act (Fairness in Apartment Rentals), the legislation passed with a veto-proof majority of 42-8, despite opposition from Republicans and conservative Democrats.