You are reading

Council Candidate Puts Forward Proposal to Protect Workers From ‘Predatory’ Food App Companies

UnSplash

April 8, 2021 By Ryan Songalia

Amit Bagga, a candidate for city council, introduced an ambitious policy proposal Thursday that aims to curb what he describes as “predatory and exploitative practices” of the City’s 80,000 food delivery workers—many of whom are immigrants—by the large food app companies.

The proposal, titled Delivery Justice Now!, represents a joint effort put together by Bagga in conjunction with industry advocates and organizations such as the Workers Justice Project and Los Deliveristas Unidos. It also has the backing of several council candidates across Queens.

Advocates argue that the app companies “lack transparency around fees, wages and restaurant payments,” something they argue needs to be rectified.

The proposal calls for the creation of a “Delivery Advocacy Board,” as well as public funding for organizations that educate workers on topics such as traffic safety and finding higher paying employment opportunities.

Council Candidate Amit S. Bagga at a rally by the Brooklyn Bridge in March

Under the proposal, a fund would be established to compensate workers who are killed or injured; funds would be available to provide workers with essential items, such as bikes, bags and phones; the practice of “scraping” would be banned, where restaurants are added to apps without their consent; and the protected bicycle lane network would be expanded—to at least 450 miles.

The policy also calls for legislation under which food delivery app companies like UberEats and Seamless would have to comply with a list of stipulations in order to obtain and maintain a license from the City’s Department of Consumer & Worker Protection.

Bagga calls for delivery workers to be provided with protection against arbitrary termination; bathroom access; in-language field assistance; and paid sick leave, which is included in the text of the “NYC’s Essential Workers Bill of Rights” legislative package, which, if passed, would extend coverage to gig workers.

“During the pandemic, from every al pastor to every pizza delivered, the Big Tech food delivery industry has made billions off consumers and restaurants, all while deeply exploiting deliveristas, and it’s now time for us to rein these companies in and have our policy reflect our values,” said Bagga, who is running to represent the 26th District that covers Sunnyside, Woodside and Long Island City.

Photo: Gustavo Ajche @AjcheGustavo

Gustavo Ajche, a member of the delivery workers organizing collective Los Deliveristas Unido, echoed Bagga’s calls for action, saying workers face a number of difficulties each day in terms of getting paid by the apps, having their bicycles stolen, and being hurt in traffic crashes.

The question of how delivery workers get paid is one not easily answered, not even by workers themselves. According to Bagga’s campaign, workers often earn as little as $400 a week, and have to wait up to a month and a half to collect their pay. The terms of payment can also be vague.

Provisions in this policy would ensure delivery workers are paid at least the city minimum wage of $15, similar to how ride share drivers are paid.

Bagga’s proposal has drawn support from other candidates running for city council in Queens and across the city.

Hailie Kim, who is also running for the District 26 seat, has thrown her support behind the proposal.

“Passing the Delivery Justice Now! proposal would be a major first step towards implementing regulations that protect the people who make and deliver our food,” Kim said.

Meanwhile, Steven Raga, another candidate running for District 26, said he backs it.

“The Delivery Justice Now proposal is a great initiative and highlights a policy issue that needs special attention,” Raga said. “Regardless of who wins this seat, justice for our deliveristas is vital and I’m happy to see many fellow candidates sign onto the plan.”

Other city council candidates in Queens to sign on in support of the proposal are Shekar Krishnan, Juan Ardila, Ingrid Gomez and Jaslin Kaur.

email the author: news@queenspost.com

8 Comments

Click for Comments 
Logan

Mandating more transparency with fees? Sure. Worker and restaurant protections? 100%

Calling for the city to create “Delivery Advocacy Board?” Seriously?! Give me a break.

We have reached peak bloat and complexity. Basic services barely function. We do not need more nonspecific bureaucracy at the margins in NYC.

3
1
Reply
Stop hiring undocumented workers, you’re undermining Americans retirement

Restaurants shouldn’t be hiring undocumented employees, it’s illegal. Legal employees already get insurance coverage if they’re hurt or killed on the job. The system was put in place to prevent this type of exploitation. Boondy strange you’re concerned about “ these restaurants can just come around and say they dont know who these workers are”, they’re undocumented, restaurants already don’t know who they are. Make criminals who are victimizing these people and stealing their bikes pay for the bikes.

Reply
Someone should build a border wall or something

Great point! Trump promised Mexico would make a “one-time payment” for The Wall. Four years later…oops that was a lie!

Hopefully the new administration will actually secure our borders.

3
2
Reply
rikki

I remember back in the day before fax machines, bike messengers were well paid, because they were delivering very important papers for lawyers, doctors hospitals, legal papers, Xrays, things that need to be signed asap and returned. But never ever food.

Reply
Anonymous

Can we put forward a motion to protect new-yorkers from predatory council members with socialist agenda?

12
4
Reply
Fox News destroys minds

Anonymous- The greater threat is Fox News and it’s misinformation campaign and manipulation of the anankastic.

6
3
Reply
ABoondy

so who will pay the $15/hour delivery charge for your $5 bigmac that you ordered? this will pretty much bring food delivery to a halt. also, how many are undocumented and work for cash? these restaurants can just come around and say they dont know who these workers are and even refuse to pay them.

7
14
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News