You are reading

Con Ed Plans to Hike Electricity and Gas Rates Next Year, Lawmakers Call for Public Hearing

More than 50 state officials are calling on the New York State Public Service Commission to hold another public hearing before ruling on the Con Edison’s proposed rate hikes (Photo: ConEd/twitter)

Sept. 27, 2022 By Christian Murray

Dozens of elected leaders—including many from Queens—are calling on the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) to hold another public hearing before deciding whether to allow Con Edison to hike electricity and gas bills next year.

More than 50 state officials led by State Sen. Mike Gianaris and Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani penned a letter to the PSC Monday demanding that it hold another hearing on Con Edison’s proposed rate hike that would raise the average customer’s overall electric bill by 11.2 percent and gas bill by 18.2 percent. The increases would take effect in 2023.

The officials say that the proposal would result in an extra $20.90 per month for electricity and $37.88 more per month for gas for the average customer. They say that most New Yorkers are unaware of the potential hike and there is a need for an additional public hearing.

“Working-class New Yorkers need another chance to be in heard in the course of this ongoing rate case which will determine whether the state accepts Con Edison’s proposal to increase already high utility rates,” the letter reads.

The letter, citing data from The City, said that more than 1.3 million New Yorkers are already behind on their utility bills, owing more than $1.7 billion. “As other household costs increase, the state cannot allow Con Edison to line their pockets while New Yorkers forgo basic needs to pay their utility bills.”

Con Edison, a publicly traded company, is calling for the increase in order to fund a $1.2 billion upgrade to its electric delivery system and a $500 million upgrade to its gas system. It is also planning to invest additional funds in renewable energy as it looks to reduce its use of fossil fuels.

Mamdani said that many residents know nothing about the looming hikes.

“An additional $60/month in Con Edison charges is something that my constituents simply cannot afford. Yet, when I canvass our neighbors about this rate case, I find that far too few of them have even heard of it.”

Mamdani is calling for a hearing and says that the hikes are motivated by corporate profit.

“New Yorkers deserve to have a place to testify how Con Edison’s corporate greed and continued funding of fossil fuel infrastructure could push them out of the neighborhoods they call home. We call on Governor Kathy Hochul’s Public Service Commission to grant us that,” Mamdani said.

Gianaris said that Con Edison customers need to be heard before the commission renders a decision.

“New York State must step in and let consumers have their say before allowing Con Edison to increase rates yet again,” Gianaris said.

Con Edison’s proposal primarily deals with hiking its delivery charges, one of the three main components—along with the supply charge and taxes—included in electric and gas bills.

Delivery charges are levied by Con Edison to maintain the system. The system transports the energy, through the use of wires, substations, towers, transistors and other related infrastructure.

The state, through the Public Service Commission, regulates the delivery rates, which Con Edison is looking to increase.

The second component is the supply charge, which changes based on the cost of fuel needed to run the generators. Con Edison is not permitted to make a profit on the supply cost.

The third component is property taxes, which Con Edison says it is required to pay $2.5 billion in 2023. Property taxes, according to the company, will account for approximately $180 million of the proposed increase in electric costs and $75 million of the proposed increase in gas costs.

The state officials argue that most New Yorkers aren’t getting their say on the potential hikes.

“While Con Edison is able to pay attorneys and lobbyists to fight for their interests, our constituents—working New Yorkers—have not been given an adequate seat at the table,” the letter reads. “We call on you to hold a public hearing immediately to give our constituents the chance to weigh in on a decision that will impact their lives deeply.”

Gianaris and Mamdani have been joined by several Queens legislators who have signed onto the letter. Other Queens officials include State Senators Jessica Ramos, Toby Ann Stavisky and John Liu, as well as Assemblymembers Nily Rozic, Andrew Hevesi, Brian Barnwell, Catalina Cruz, Clyde Vanel, David Weprin, Khaleel Anderson and Jessica González-Rojas.

email the author: news@queenspost.com

18 Comments

Click for Comments 
Jones

When is the heat coming on? Its freezing at night. 311 wont file my complaints. The tents for the people from Texas are warmer than public housing!!!

3
9
Reply
Anonymous

This crew of scumbags blaming ConEd for the rate increases that their policies caused would be funny if it wasn’t so obscene.

17
3
Reply
Another Fox Groomed Manipulated and incited banner waving bandwagon jumper

Anonymous- Which article are you responding to? To quote this article, you obviously didn’t read:” Con Edison, a publicly traded company, is calling for the increase in order to fund a $1.2 billion upgrade to its electric delivery system and a $500 million upgrade to its gas system. It is also planning to invest additional funds in renewable energy as it looks to reduce its use of fossil fuels.”

5
6
Reply
Ministry of Truth

There is a treatment for Fox News Derangement Syndrome. It’s called changing the channel. There are plenty of left wing propaganda stations on cable for you to choose from.

2
2
Reply
Anonymous

Increased property taxes that ConEd passes to customers, who can we blame for that? Increased cost of power transmission. Who shutdown the plant that supplied 20% of NYC’s power? Move away from fossil fuel. Who mandated generating power from happy thoughts and good intentions. The answer to all these questions is same scumbags now barking about the “evil” monopoly. I have no love for ConEd but the politicians caused the rate increases, ConEd will pass the expenses to the end users. They’re in business to make money not get re-elected.

5
1
Reply
Anonymous

You sir are what was in the past and probably still is referred to as a useful idiot by the people you admire most.

The Big Apple Circus

Going green and going broke. Let’s fire up those nuclear power plants again and or building some new ones with todays tech and understanding. cue the childish environmental rage. what happened to all the infrastructure bill that cost us all Trillions? why do we add to the national debt, but still have to pay for infrastructure in America’s largest city not even subsidized a little to reduce the pain of cost. A extra $60 a month equals $720 more a year. Thats a weeks work for many after taxes ( more ) These politicians need to do more than just give the public a platform to yell at Con Ed and then be ignored anyway. We are being conned! (excuse the pun) by our Government and these utilities/corps. We need new elected officials! They are bleeding us slowly!

15
Reply
Why are you blaming Trump?

I agree, Trump pretended he’d spend $1 trillion on infrastructure. Just like The Wall, that lie has been exposed.

What does that have to do with ConEd?

3
8
Reply
JoeBama Magoo

dont worry, Convict Edison will make something up. they always do. but dont worry, Hoochul will send a very harsh letter to them for an explanation, then do nothing about, just like earlier this year. i mean, Convict Edison is a monopoly. nobody can touch them.

9
1
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

City Council passes bill shifting broker fee burden to landlords, sparking backlash from real estate industry and key critics

Nov. 14, 2024 By Ethan Stark-Miller and QNS News Team

The New York City Council passed a landmark bill on Wednesday, aiming to relieve renters of paying hefty broker fees — a cost that will now fall on the party who hires the listing agent. Known as the FARE Act (Fairness in Apartment Rentals), the legislation passed with a veto-proof majority of 42-8, despite opposition from Republicans and conservative Democrats.